Pay in installments of $6.02 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 3 - Jul 8
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
top loader binder for trading cards 4-Pocket Black Toploader Binder for Trading Cards – CardshellzBinder has padded, extra rigid front and rear covers made from water resistant and non slip textured polyurethane "leather" material. Fit 112 toploaders up to 100pt. Features 28 Archival safe 4 pocket pages, holders 112 total toploaded cards Fits standard size trading cards in 35pt 55pt toploaders* Secure side loading pockets Heavy duty security zipper Acid free no PVC plastic pages * Up to a 100pt toploader will fit in one side of a binder page but
Binder has padded, extra rigid front and rear covers made from water-resistant and non-slip textured polyurethane "leather" material. Fit 112 toploaders up to 100pt.
Features
- 28 Archival safe 4-pocket pages, holders 112 total toploaded cards
- Fits standard size trading cards in 35pt-55pt toploaders*
- Secure side-loading pockets
- Heavy-duty security zipper
- Acid-free / no PVC plastic pages
* Up to a 100pt toploader will fit in one side of a binder page but not both (front and back) and using these larger toploaders will impact the overall capacity of the binder.
Dimensions
Height: 11" (283mm)
Width: 9" (210mm)
Depth: 1.5: (68mm)
Capacity: Fits 112 trading cards in Toploaders up to 100pt
Weight: 1.5lbs empty
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 2165 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Favorite treat of all time for our Maltese pup.
Pattern Name: Lollipop, Size: 0.53 Ounce (Pack of 4)
These are my Maltese dog’s favorite treat. I don’t know if it is the whole combination of shape, taster, tendon location, or that they are from a Turkey, but they are an absolute winner when we have them.
Since they are quite expensive, we only get them on occasion. If they were less expensive, even by 10%, I would justify regular purchases of them to myself.
I highly recommend them for any size, breed, or reason. They are an exceptionally wonderful treat for my pup.
I think I have just found the reason for ordering another order of these Turkey Tendon lollipops for my best friend. Especially since he eats them quite quickly, even though he is only four pounds. And they seem to be quite digestible.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect treat for my Dolcé!
Pattern Name: Bone, Size: 0.53 Ounce (Pack of 4)
My 14 pound Maltipoo LOVES these. It keeps her occupied for a good 30 minutes. Be sure to get the bone-shaped ones because little dogs will choke on the lollipop-shaped ones.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
My dogs love these!
Pattern Name: Ring, Size: 0.42 Ounce (Pack of 10)
I have three very large dogs who absolutely love these treats. They are very picky because they’re very spoiled! But yes, they love these!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good value
Pattern Name: Ring, Size: 0.42 Ounce (Pack of 10)
This is a new treat for our sweet girl and she loves it! She’s a small dog so I break them in two and it’s just enough.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Overpriced but beloved
Pattern Name: Ring, Size: 0.42 Ounce (Pack of 10)
I think these are so expensive but it really helps my teething dog!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026